Evidence over claims. Assurance over automation.

Services

One primary productized offer. Everything else is secondary or follow-on.

Public matching and launch focus on a free one-workflow diagnostic and a fixed-scope design sprint. Implementation, claims audits, and research remain available when the problem actually requires them. They are not equal peer products on the front door.

Primary · fixed-scope design sprint

Workflow Evidence Hardening Design Sprint

Map one important workflow’s evidence chain, register reconstruction and provenance gaps, recommend controls and review gates, and deliver a prioritized hardening plan. Design phase only. Production implementation stays outside the fee.

CAD 8,000 fixed fee 2-3 weeks One named workflow Design, not production build
View sprint
Entry point · free

One-workflow evidence diagnostic

Start with a short written description of one workflow. Optional ~45 minute live walkthrough when it helps. Written outcome stays short: proceed, not a fit, or insufficient access. No free maps, registers, or solution design.

No cost Written intake Optional ~45 min call Three short decisions only
Request diagnostic

Follow-on

Implementation when the design sprint (or diagnostic) says build is justified

This is the separately scoped path after design, or when the workflow is already clear enough to pilot. It is not the public price anchor.

Follow-on · design and implementation

Controlled AI Workflow Automation

Design and implement one bounded AI-assisted workflow with human oversight, approved sources, exception handling, acceptance testing, retained operational evidence, and a safe fallback. Pricing confirmed after diagnostic.

Fixed-scope pilot One workflow Working implementation Price after diagnostic
View automation path

Also available

Secondary offers when the problem is not the primary workflow evidence shape

Kept on the site so the right buyer can find them. Not elevated as equal peer flagships for launch matching.

Secondary

Buyer-Readiness Claims Audit

Determine which AI, compliance, performance, validation, and outcome claims are supported, vulnerable, or not checkable within the supplied evidence boundary.

Claim register Evidence map Buyer objections Price after diagnostic
View audit
Secondary

Evidence Intelligence Research Sprint

Answer a consequential technical, regulatory, market, or strategic question using an explicit research protocol, controlled source register, competing interpretations, and a decision memo.

Research question Source register Decision memo Price after diagnostic
View research

After the assessment or pilot

Bounded follow-on support where it creates value

Remediation, verification, expansion, and advisory are follow-on services, not vague retainers attached before the problem is understood.

Evidence remediation

Revise claim wording, define evidence-generation priorities, design records and review gates, or prepare a controlled implementation specification.

Verification review

Assess whether agreed gaps were resolved and whether the retained completion evidence satisfies the original verification criterion.

Pilot expansion and integration

Extend a successful bounded pilot to additional sources, systems, users, or workflow stages under a separately controlled scope.

Ongoing evidence and workflow advisory

Periodic review for organizations that repeatedly change consequential workflows, launch AI capabilities, revise claims, or answer buyer questionnaires.

Boundaries matter

The work is not certification, legal advice, or a promise of acceptance or return on investment.

It evaluates or implements a defined workflow, claim set, or research question inside an agreed boundary. It does not replace regulators, legal counsel, security testing, qualified validation professionals, a buyer’s own review process, or the client’s responsibility for production operation and intended use.

Standard public commitments

  • Scope and exclusions before substantive analysis or implementation
  • Use the simplest reliable method, including non-AI automation where appropriate
  • Evidence, inference, generated output, and human judgment remain distinct
  • Contradictions, failure states, and limitations remain visible
  • Every released package carries status and version information

Start with one workflow that needs a stronger evidence chain.

A short non-confidential description is enough to decide whether the free diagnostic and design sprint are the right path.